Pequeño análisis acerca de los medios de información convencionales

A continuación se presentará un pequeño análisis personal del autor del sitio, sobre la credibilidad de los principales medios de información, desde un punto de vista crítico, basado en hechos.

Comenzamos, primero, con lo que dijo el propio Brzezinski (quien estuvo directamente implicado en la financiación y armado de los extremistas islámicos en Pakistán y Afganistán), en donde menciona un “despertar político mundial” y señala que se ha vuelto “cada vez más difícil suprimir” y controlar la “resistencia persistente y altamente motivada de los pueblos políticos despertados”. En donde, obviamente, lo anterior, no pudo haber sido posible sólo con la MSM, por lo que gran parte de ello, fue debido a los medios de información independientes y al internet (el condenado internet para ellos XD), tal como se detalla más adelante.

Otra cita y video de este señor:

 Fragmento original:
“The major world powers, new and old, also face a novel reality: while the lethality of their military might is greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low. To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people”.

Dejo también una antigua encuesta de Gallup sobre la confianza en los noticieros y prensa escrita (ambos 23%):

[IMG]

Fuente: http://www.gallup.com/poll/163052/americans-confidence-congress-falls-lowest-record.aspx

Mencionar, además, los lazos familiares entre reporteros y personajes políticos:

[IMG]

Fuente: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa…edia-honchos-related-towhite-house-officials/

De hecho, ya lo decía (y demostrado) Assange con los emails de Clinton:

 Fragmento original:

Hannity: “I said in my country Julian that journalism is dead. I said it in 2008, because I was investigating Barack Obama and his background and his associations and his career and his lack of knowledge and his radical belief system, and everybody in the media ignored a lot of it. So my question to you then is now knowing what Wikileaks revealed about the Podesta emails – on Clinton corruption, on pay-to-play, on Bernie Sanders being cheated, all of this is revealed. Not a lot of it was covered. So what does that say to the American people about media coverage in America? Dishonest?”

Assange: “It’s very dishonest. Corrupt is interesting. It depends on your definition. If you look at what we published in the Podesta emails—”

Hannity: “They’re colluding with Hillary. That’s not corrupt?”

Assange: “It’s an ethical corruption.”

Hannity: “They’re not identifying it to their audiences. They claim that they’re objective journalists.”

Assange: “It’s ethically corrupt, corrupt by—corruption also means something more, which is that you’re taking money in exchange. So I don’t think that—”

Hannity: “Collusion.”

Assange: “They’re colluding, yeah.”

Fuente: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article…dia-very-dishonest-says-they-colluded-hillary

Algunos pequeños ejemplos:

 Fragmento original:

A Politico reporter called himself a “hack” when he asked Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide John Podesta to look over sections of his unpublished report on the Democratic presidential candidate before publication, a recent email revealed by WikiLeaks shows.

“Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u [sic],” Thrush wrote to Podesta. “Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this…tell me if I f—ed up anything.”

Fuente: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201…n-article-past-podesta-wikileaks-reveals.html

y…

Fragmento original:

A massive dump of Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails via Wikileaks has revealed that Politico reporter Ken Vogel sent an advance copy of a story — in its entirety — to top DNC communication officials to review before it was published.

“Per agreement … any thoughts appreciated,” Vogel wrote to DNC national press secretary Mark Paustenbach on April 30, attaching a full draft of the story before it went to Politico editors.

Paustenbach then forwarded the email to DNC deputy communications director Luis Miranda.

“Vogel gave me his story ahead of time/before it goes to his editors as long as I didn’t share it. Let me know if you see anything that’s missing and I’ll push back,” wrote Paustenbach.

Fuente: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief…nt-story-to-dem-committee-for-pre-publication

No por nada, la CIA quiere “hacerse cargo” de Wikileaks (tal parece que está revelando mucha información incómoda):

Fragmento original:

Trump’s CIA Director Pompeo, Targeting WikiLeaks, Explicitly Threatens Speech and Press Freedoms

Decreeing (with no evidence) that WikiLeaks is “a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia” a belief that has become gospel in establishment Democratic Party circles – Pompeo proclaimed that “we have to recognize that we can no longer allow Assange and his colleagues the latitude to use free speech values against us.” He also argued that while WikiLeaks “pretended that America’s First Amendment freedoms shield them from justice,” but: “they may have believed that, but they are wrong.”

He then issued this remarkable threat: “To give them the space to crush us with misappropriated secrets is a perversion of what our great Constitution stands for. It ends now.” At no point did Pompeo specify what steps the CIA intended to take to ensure that the “space” to publish secrets “ends now.”

Fuente: https://theintercept.com/2017/04/14…plicitly-threatens-speech-and-press-freedoms/

Para finalizar, recordemos además, la tan famosa Operación Mockingbird de la CIA: La Operación Mockingbird de la CIA, a principios de los años 50, fue expuesta cuando los informes de Church Committee publicaron pruebas de vínculos de la CIA con medios nacionales y extranjeros, entre otras tácticas cuestionables llevadas a cabo por las comunidades de inteligencia. La Operation Mockingbird es ahora una importante operación desclasficada de la CIA que admite abiertamente la manipulación de las agencias de noticias con fines de propaganda y desinformación.

Anuncios

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s